What this error means

bge-m3 returns HTTP 500 with 'json: unsupported value: NaN' when embedding certain markdown files is a Ollama failure pattern reported for developers trying to fix ollama bge-m3 embedding model returning http 500 with nan json serialization error. Based on the imported evidence, treat this as a tool-specific troubleshooting page rather than a generic API error.

Why this happens

Active GitHub issue (May 2026) reports bge-m3 model returns HTTP 500 with 'json: unsupported value: NaN' for specific markdown files. The error is deterministic — the same file consistently triggers it across restarts. Other files in the same corpus embed without issue.

Common causes

  • Embedding models are critical for RAG pipelines. When bge-m3 produces NaN values that the JSON serializer cannot encode, it breaks the entire embedding pipeline for specific files deterministically.
  • Active GitHub issue (May 2026) reports bge-m3 model returns HTTP 500 with 'json: unsupported value: NaN' for specific markdown files. The error is deterministic — the same file consistently triggers it across restarts. Other files in the same corpus embed without issue.

Quick fixes

  1. Confirm the exact error signature matches bge-m3 returns HTTP 500 with 'json: unsupported value: NaN' when embedding certain markdown files.
  2. Check the Ollama account, local tool state, and provider configuration involved in the failing workflow.
  3. Compare the failing environment with a known working setup, then change one configuration value at a time.

Platform/tool-specific checks

  • Verify the command, editor, extension, or API client that produced the error.
  • Compare local settings with CI, deployment, or editor-level settings when the error appears in only one environment.
  • Avoid deleting credentials, local model data, or project settings until the failing scope is clear.

Step-by-step troubleshooting

  1. Capture the exact error message and the command, editor action, or request that triggered it.
  2. Check whether the failure is account/auth, quota/rate, model/provider, local runtime, or deployment configuration.
  3. Review the source evidence below and compare it with your environment.
  4. Apply one change at a time and rerun the smallest failing action.
  5. Keep the working fix documented for the team or deployment environment.

How to prevent it

  • Keep provider/tool configuration documented.
  • Record non-secret diagnostics such as tool version, provider name, model name, and command path.
  • Add a lightweight check before CI or production workflows depend on the tool.