LiteLLM / LiteLLM
No Retry-After header on LiteLLM RouterRateLimitError
Add Retry-After header support to LiteLLM rate limit errors so clients can implement proper exponential backoff Includes evidence for LiteLLM troubleshooting demand.
- Category
- LiteLLM
- Error signature
RouterRateLimitError: No Retry-After header returned when all deployments in cooldown period- Quick fix
- Reduce request pressure, check quota or plan limits, and retry with backoff instead of immediate repeated requests.
- Updated
What this error means
RouterRateLimitError: No Retry-After header returned when all deployments in cooldown period is a LiteLLM failure pattern reported for developers trying to add retry-after header support to litellm rate limit errors so clients can implement proper exponential backoff. Based on the imported evidence, treat this as a tool-specific troubleshooting page rather than a generic API error.
Why this happens
GitHub issue BerriAI/litellm#27823 by b4lduin (May 13 2026). When LiteLLM proxy router exhausts all deployed endpoints, it raises RouterRateLimitError but provides no Retry-After header. Clients have no way to know when to retry, causing immediate hammering of cooldown deployments. Affects self-hosted LiteLLM proxy deployments managing multiple model providers. Labels: llm translation, high commercial impact for proxy operators who need predictable rate limiting behavior.
Common causes
- GitHub issue BerriAI/litellm#27823 by b4lduin (May 13 2026). When LiteLLM proxy router exhausts all deployed endpoints, it raises RouterRateLimitError but provides no Retry-After header. Clients have no way to know when to retry, causing immediate hammering of cooldown deployments. Affects self-hosted LiteLLM proxy deployments managing multiple model providers. Labels: llm translation, high commercial impact for proxy operators who need predictable rate limiting behavior.
Quick fixes
- Confirm the exact error signature matches
RouterRateLimitError: No Retry-After header returned when all deployments in cooldown period. - Check the LiteLLM account, local tool state, and provider configuration involved in the failing workflow.
- Reduce request pressure, check quota or plan limits, and retry with backoff instead of immediate repeated requests.
Platform/tool-specific checks
- Verify the command, editor, extension, or API client that produced the error.
- Compare local settings with CI, deployment, or editor-level settings when the error appears in only one environment.
- Avoid deleting credentials, local model data, or project settings until the failing scope is clear.
Step-by-step troubleshooting
- Capture the exact error message and the command, editor action, or request that triggered it.
- Check whether the failure is account/auth, quota/rate, model/provider, local runtime, or deployment configuration.
- Review the source evidence below and compare it with your environment.
- Apply one change at a time and rerun the smallest failing action.
- Keep the working fix documented for the team or deployment environment.
How to prevent it
- Keep provider/tool configuration documented.
- Record non-secret diagnostics such as tool version, provider name, model name, and command path.
- Add a lightweight check before CI or production workflows depend on the tool.
Sources checked
Evidence note: GitHub issue BerriAI/litellm#27823 by b4lduin (May 13 2026). When LiteLLM proxy router exhausts all deployed endpoints, it raises RouterRateLimitError but provides no Retry-After header. Clients have no way to know when to retry, causing immediate hammering of cooldown deployments. Affects self-hosted LiteLLM proxy deployments managing multiple model providers. Labels: llm translation, high commercial impact for proxy operators who need predictable rate limiting behavior.
Related errors
- LiteLLM
FAQ
What should I check first?
Start with the exact RouterRateLimitError: No Retry-After header returned when all deployments in cooldown period text and the smallest action that reproduces it.
Can I ignore this error?
No. Treat it as a failed LiteLLM workflow until the root cause is understood.
Is this guaranteed to have one fix?
No. The imported evidence supports the troubleshooting path above, but tool behavior can vary by account, plan, version, provider, and local configuration.
How do I know the fix worked?
Rerun the same command, editor action, or request. The fix is working when that action completes without RouterRateLimitError: No Retry-After header returned when all deployments in cooldown period.