LiteLLM / LiteLLM

LiteLLM PyPI Supply Chain Compromise — v1.82.7/v1.82.8 Steal Credentials via Malicious Code

Check if LiteLLM package is safe / recover from compromised PyPI install Includes evidence for LiteLLM troubleshooting demand.

Category
LiteLLM
Error signature
litellm PyPI package (v1.82.7 + v1.82.8) compromised — credential theft via malicious code in proxy_server.py and litellm_init.pth
Quick fix
Compare the failing environment with a known working setup, then change one configuration value at a time.
Updated

What this error means

litellm PyPI package (v1.82.7 + v1.82.8) compromised — credential theft via malicious code in proxy_server.py and litellm_init.pth is a LiteLLM failure pattern reported for developers trying to check if litellm package is safe / recover from compromised pypi install. Based on the imported evidence, treat this as a tool-specific troubleshooting page rather than a generic API error.

Why this happens

116 comments on GitHub issue. Compromised versions published by attacker who hijacked maintainer PyPI account. Malicious code exfiltrates credentials to attacker-controlled litellm.cloud domain. PyPI package suspended, current releases clean. Engaged Mandiant for investigation.

Common causes

Quick fixes

  1. Confirm the exact error signature matches litellm PyPI package (v1.82.7 + v1.82.8) compromised — credential theft via malicious code in proxy_server.py and litellm_init.pth.
  2. Check the LiteLLM account, local tool state, and provider configuration involved in the failing workflow.
  3. Compare the failing environment with a known working setup, then change one configuration value at a time.

Platform/tool-specific checks

Step-by-step troubleshooting

  1. Capture the exact error message and the command, editor action, or request that triggered it.
  2. Check whether the failure is account/auth, quota/rate, model/provider, local runtime, or deployment configuration.
  3. Review the source evidence below and compare it with your environment.
  4. Apply one change at a time and rerun the smallest failing action.
  5. Keep the working fix documented for the team or deployment environment.

How to prevent it

Sources checked

Evidence note: 116 comments on GitHub issue. Compromised versions published by attacker who hijacked maintainer PyPI account. Malicious code exfiltrates credentials to attacker-controlled litellm.cloud domain. PyPI package suspended, current releases clean. Engaged Mandiant for investigation.

FAQ

What should I check first?

Start with the exact litellm PyPI package (v1.82.7 + v1.82.8) compromised — credential theft via malicious code in proxy_server.py and litellm_init.pth text and the smallest action that reproduces it.

Can I ignore this error?

No. Treat it as a failed LiteLLM workflow until the root cause is understood.

Is this guaranteed to have one fix?

No. The imported evidence supports the troubleshooting path above, but tool behavior can vary by account, plan, version, provider, and local configuration.

How do I know the fix worked?

Rerun the same command, editor action, or request. The fix is working when that action completes without litellm PyPI package (v1.82.7 + v1.82.8) compromised — credential theft via malicious code in proxy_server.py and litellm_init.pth.