What this error means

dangerouslySkipPermissions setting does not work in VS Code — still prompts for permission even when setting is enabled is a Claude Code failure pattern reported for developers trying to fix vs code extension ignoring the dangerouslyskippermissions configuration option — users want automated workflow without repeated permission prompts. Based on the imported evidence, treat this as a tool-specific troubleshooting page rather than a generic API error.

Why this happens

Issue #61000 open 2026-05-20, 1 comment. claude-code v2.1.126 on macOS VS Code. Permission-skip setting ineffective, blocking automated CI/CD-style workflows. Commercial value: medium-high — users enabling automation get interrupted by interactive permission prompts. Category: AI Coding Tools per Claude Code mapping.

Common causes

  • Issue #61000 open 2026-05-20, 1 comment. claude-code v2.1.126 on macOS VS Code. Permission-skip setting ineffective, blocking automated CI/CD-style workflows. Commercial value: medium-high — users enabling automation get interrupted by interactive permission prompts. Category: AI Coding Tools per Claude Code mapping.

Quick fixes

  1. Confirm the exact error signature matches dangerouslySkipPermissions setting does not work in VS Code — still prompts for permission even when setting is enabled.
  2. Check the Claude Code account, local tool state, and provider configuration involved in the failing workflow.
  3. Compare the failing environment with a known working setup, then change one configuration value at a time.

Platform/tool-specific checks

  • Verify the command, editor, extension, or API client that produced the error.
  • Compare local settings with CI, deployment, or editor-level settings when the error appears in only one environment.
  • Avoid deleting credentials, local model data, or project settings until the failing scope is clear.

Step-by-step troubleshooting

  1. Capture the exact error message and the command, editor action, or request that triggered it.
  2. Check whether the failure is account/auth, quota/rate, model/provider, local runtime, or deployment configuration.
  3. Review the source evidence below and compare it with your environment.
  4. Apply one change at a time and rerun the smallest failing action.
  5. Keep the working fix documented for the team or deployment environment.

How to prevent it

  • Keep provider/tool configuration documented.
  • Record non-secret diagnostics such as tool version, provider name, model name, and command path.
  • Add a lightweight check before CI or production workflows depend on the tool.