What this error means
litellm.BadRequestError: LLM Provider NOT provided. Pass in the LLM provider you are trying to call. is a LiteLLM failure pattern reported for developers trying to fix litellm llm_as_a_judge guardrail failing with badrequesterror when using vllm self-hosted model. Based on the imported evidence, treat this as a tool-specific troubleshooting page rather than a generic API error.
Why this happens
Official BerriAI/litellm GitHub issue (v1.83.14). Self-hosted vLLM model (google/gemma-4-31B-it) works in LiteLLM playground but fails with litellm.BadRequestError in llm_as_a_judge guardrail. Both vllm and OpenAI compatible endpoint providers affected. Kubernetes helm chart deployment.
Common causes
- Developers running self-hosted LLMs via vLLM through LiteLLM proxy encounter a BadRequestError when using the llm_as_a_judge guardrail feature. The model works fine for normal queries but fails specifically in guardrail evaluation, blocking AI safety/quality pipelines in production Kubernetes deployments.
- Official BerriAI/litellm GitHub issue (v1.83.14). Self-hosted vLLM model (google/gemma-4-31B-it) works in LiteLLM playground but fails with litellm.BadRequestError in llm_as_a_judge guardrail. Both vllm and OpenAI compatible endpoint providers affected. Kubernetes helm chart deployment.
Quick fixes
- Confirm the exact error signature matches
litellm.BadRequestError: LLM Provider NOT provided. Pass in the LLM provider you are trying to call.. - Check the LiteLLM account, local tool state, and provider configuration involved in the failing workflow.
- Compare the failing environment with a known working setup, then change one configuration value at a time.
Platform/tool-specific checks
- Verify the command, editor, extension, or API client that produced the error.
- Compare local settings with CI, deployment, or editor-level settings when the error appears in only one environment.
- Avoid deleting credentials, local model data, or project settings until the failing scope is clear.
Step-by-step troubleshooting
- Capture the exact error message and the command, editor action, or request that triggered it.
- Check whether the failure is account/auth, quota/rate, model/provider, local runtime, or deployment configuration.
- Review the source evidence below and compare it with your environment.
- Apply one change at a time and rerun the smallest failing action.
- Keep the working fix documented for the team or deployment environment.
How to prevent it
- Keep provider/tool configuration documented.
- Record non-secret diagnostics such as tool version, provider name, model name, and command path.
- Add a lightweight check before CI or production workflows depend on the tool.